🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the tension sparked by the introduction of a new 28-point plan for ending the war appeared – briefly – to have been contained. A Washington representative spoke of "substantial progress" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its retaliation: another massive barrage of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Peace Talks and Military Action

The succession of contrasting events captured the harsh reality of the recent timeframe. By day, political struggles are fought: optimistic declarations are released from various governments. Significant resources is devoted on restraining particular approaches. By night, Moscow brutally reminds the world that, for them, war remains the key method for achieving "resolution".

After-Dark Attacks

As the offensive developed into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's vulnerability was exposed. Ukraine is capable of detecting projectile deployments from across the border, a capability provided through timely intelligence. From witness perspectives, military aircraft that had been dispatched to engage hostile cruise missiles roared overhead – modern combat jets provided to Ukraine by European allies.

Moments later, Kyiv's air-defence systems engaged: defensive missiles targeted at a Russian ballistic missile. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, most likely provided by partner states. Every deployment shakes the surroundings, rattling buildings. The moment of terror quickly gives way to grim resignation: possibly the incoming missile won't strike its target this time, preventing destruction from devastation and further power outages.

Ongoing Risks

Not long after, a heavy machine gun engaged a unmanned aircraft in the vicinity, part of a defensive team – probably allied-provided weaponry. Sadly, the shots failed to hit the opposing UAV – it pressed on overhead toward its target.

Intermittently, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv greeted the morning news: seven people killed, damage and infrastructure problems in multiple buildings as a result of the evening attack. As typically, everyone still went about their day – living the war. But those entire period demonstrated Ukraine's essential dependence on international aid – a dependence that European nations are clearly incapable to substitute in the near term.

Failed Diplomacy

The detailed framework from Washington generated strong feelings, controversy and deep concern – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after earlier high-level meetings and bilateral conferences.

Every new proposal from American administration adheres to the consistent cycle: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, manages to fend off. They manage the tension but never actually win the battle. This cycle will, undoubtedly, persist.

Tactical Assessments

It is easy to blame certain parties of consistently pushing Kremlin's demands. But that does not seem to be the whole story. Washington functions according to a assumption well known to international relations experts: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have failed to defend militarily. The US administration believes that it is impossible to pressure the Kremlin to abandon the areas that it presently holds in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The problem is that while recognising this factual reality, American administration does minimal to prevent Kremlin actions, through diplomacy or military means, from assuming that the situation will not change more in its benefit in the coming year.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, the Kremlin is certain that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its supporters are coming close to fatigue. Their reason to agree to terms that does not give them the maximum possible gain is almost completely absent. There may be numerous efforts to achieve ceasefire, but they will continue as long as Russia's leadership remains supremely confident in the conclusion.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still endure, gradually sacrificing people and territory but preventing a total frontline collapse until conditions improve in its advantage.

Existing Situation

Factually, there are no real preconditions for a truce. Now, individual motivations are coming into play: personal goals to mediate resolution and achieve global acclaim, and the government's double obstacles – on one hand, not to distance important partners, and on the other, to mobilize citizens around the country's interests against any initiative Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their focus does not move to domestic problems. And although their mission will now be much harder after recent developments, it remains quite doubtful that this will modify their basic position.

These two forces are driving the talks.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a only one week to eliminate the suggested clauses of the current initiative. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by American leadership, pushback by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with calming attempts of diplomats, and finally, recent disclosures, all did their job.

While new proposals based on old ideas are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter negotiation assaults from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and reflect certain reluctance to alter the situation, if they stand together and improve their protective measures at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to repel nightly air assaults will, for the coming months, mainly require sustained allied backing.